Keywords
ChatGPT
Systematic literature review
PRISMA
Generative AI
Research ethics
Educational personalization
Formative assessment
How to Cite
Abstract
This article explores the possibilities following the impact that Generative Artificial Intelligence, especially ChatGPT, has had on education and research, focusing on Systematic Literature Reviews (SLR) according to the PRISMA method. It analyzes how ChatGPT can assist in the identification and selection of literature, data extraction and synthesis, and the evaluation of study quality. The discussion also covers the potential of Generative AI to enhance learning, personalize education, and formative and summative assessment. In addition, it reflects on the ethical challenges and necessary precautions when integrating these technologies into research practices. It concludes that while ChatGPT offers significant opportunities for efficiency and quality in SLRs, careful and ethical use is essential, highlighting the importance of proper citation and transparency in its application.
References
Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
Amo Filvà, D., Alier, M., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Fonseca, D., & Casañ, M. J. (2020). Privacidad, seguridad y legalidad en soluciones educativas basadas en Blockchain: Una Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 23(2). Asociación Iberoamericana de Educación Superior a Distancia. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.23.2.26388
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1–e34.
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467.
https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Harris, J. D., Quatman, C. E., Manring, M. M., Siston, R. A., & Flanigan, D. C. (2013). How to write a systematic review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(10), 2319-2326.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513497567
Sallam, M. (2023). The Utility of ChatGPT as an Example of Large Language Models in Healthcare Education, Research and Practice: Systematic Review on the Future Perspectives and Potential Limitations. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.19.23286155
Open AI, & Ekin, S. (2023). Prompt Engineering For ChatGPT: A Quick Guide To Techniques, Tips, And Best Practices. Texas A&M University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370554061_Prompt_Engineering_For_ChatGPT_A_Quick_Guide_To_Techniques_Tips_And_Best_Practices
Shuai Wang, Harrisen Scells, Guido Zuccon, and Bevan Koopman. 2023. Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search?. 1, 1 (February 2023), 19 pages.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3539618.3591703
OpenAI. (2023). Prompt Engineering Guide. [Página web]. https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/prompt-engineering
Lingard L. Writing with ChatGPT: An Illustration of its Capacity, Limitations & Implications for Academic Writers. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2023; 12(1): 261–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1072
Scharth, M. (2022). The ChatGPT chatbot is blowing people away with its writing skills. The University of Sydney. https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2022/12/08/the-chatgpt-chatbot-is-blowing-people-away-with-its-writing-skil.html
Cooper, G. Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence. J Sci Educ Technol 32, 444–452 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
Giannini, S. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385877
Ruiz Mendoza, K. K. (2023). El uso de ChatGPT 4.0 para la elaboración de exámenes: crear el prompt adecuado : The Use of ChatGPT 4.0 for Test Development: Creating the Right Prompt. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(2), 6142–6157. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i2.1040
García Peñalvo, F. J., Llorens-Largo, F., & Vidal, J. (2024). The new reality of education in the face of advances in generative artificial intelligence. [La nueva realidad de la educación ante los avances de la inteligencia artificial generativa]. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.27.1.37716
Chomsky, N., Roberts I., & Watumull, J. (8 de marzo de 2023). Noam Chomsky: The False Promise of ChatGPT. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opinion/noam-chomsky-chatgpt-ai.html
PRISMA (2020). Diagrama de flujo. [Página web]. https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram
Gontijo da Matta, V., & da Matta Felisberto, J. L. (2022). Revisión sistemática sobre los desafíos de la educación superior en línea durante la pandemia del COVID-19. Revista Ciencia UNEMI, 15(38), 14-23.
https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-7737vol15iss38.22pp14-23p
Montenegro-Rueda, M.; Luque-de la Rosa, A.; Sarasola Sánchez-Serrano, J.L.; FernándezCerero, J. Assessment in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910509
McAdoo, T. (2023). How to cite ChatGPT. American Pshychological Association. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 http://revista.sciencevolution.com/